Difference between revisions of "Time Also Speed Up, Dr. Einstein?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The author shows that the speed of light, relative to any observer, is not constant in [10] and also, by contradiction, in this paper. This leads to mathematical disproof of Special Relativity and its derivatives such as Dr. Einstein's famous mass ? energy equivalence, , which he incorrectly derived. Thus the very foundation of 21st century physics is invalid. This leads to the author's anti-neutron theory/model of the atom [16].[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The author shows that the speed of light, relative to any observer, is not constant in [10] and also, by contradiction, in this paper. This leads to mathematical disproof of Special Relativity and its derivatives such as Dr. Einstein's famous mass ? energy equivalence, , which he incorrectly derived. Thus the very foundation of 21st century physics is invalid. This leads to the author's anti-neutron theory/model of the atom [16]. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time speed dr einstein]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 11:31, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Time Also Speed Up, Dr. Einstein? |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Glenn Albert Baxter |
Keywords | Special Relativity |
Published | 2012 |
Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
Volume | 9 |
No. of pages | 7 |
Pages | 20-26 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The author shows that the speed of light, relative to any observer, is not constant in [10] and also, by contradiction, in this paper. This leads to mathematical disproof of Special Relativity and its derivatives such as Dr. Einstein's famous mass ? energy equivalence, , which he incorrectly derived. Thus the very foundation of 21st century physics is invalid. This leads to the author's anti-neutron theory/model of the atom [16].