Difference between revisions of "A Simple Classical Interpretation of Fizeau's Experiment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]] | ||
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | A Simple Classical Interpretation of Fizeau\'s Experiment |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Umberto Bartocci, Giuseppe Antoni |
Keywords | Special Relativity, Stokes's Aether Theory, Speed |
Published | 2001 |
Journal | Apeiron |
Volume | 8 |
Number | 3 |
No. of pages | 7 |
Pages | 139-145 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
It is well known that Stokes's aether dragged theory is one of the best classical aether theories, since it is in agreement with almost all experimental results (see for instance R. Resnick's popular textbook: Introduction to Special Relativity). This theory is usually dismissed on the grounds of two natural phenomena, which are said to be "unexplainable" in Stokes's conceptual context: Bradley's astronomical annual aberration, and the speed of light in moving water (Fizeau's experiment). In this paper, a simple "time-delay" model for the behaviour of light in a transparent medium is given, which at least gets rid of the second of the two previous objections.