Jump to content

Action-at-a-Distance on the Light Cone: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


I will present a description of a modified version of what is known as the ?Wheeler-Feynman action-at-a-distance? formulation of relativistic electrodynamics, but devoid of advanced interaction and asymmetric aging. I will describe initial results of a study using this formulation to analyze time dilation experiments using muon decay which shows that this is a space-time perspective effect that does not contribute to asymmetric aging (the twin paradox).[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
I will present a description of a modified version of what is known as the ?Wheeler-Feynman action-at-a-distance? formulation of relativistic electrodynamics, but devoid of advanced interaction and asymmetric aging. I will describe initial results of a study using this formulation to analyze time dilation experiments using muon decay which shows that this is a space-time perspective effect that does not contribute to asymmetric aging (the twin paradox).


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|action-at-a-distance light cone]]
 
[[Category:Relativity|action-at-a-distance light cone]]

Latest revision as of 22:15, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleAction-at-a-Distance on the Light Cone
Author(s)Al F Kracklauer
KeywordsWheeler-Feynman, relativistic electrodynamics, time dilation, asymmetric aging
Published2006
JournalNone

Abstract

I will present a description of a modified version of what is known as the ?Wheeler-Feynman action-at-a-distance? formulation of relativistic electrodynamics, but devoid of advanced interaction and asymmetric aging. I will describe initial results of a study using this formulation to analyze time dilation experiments using muon decay which shows that this is a space-time perspective effect that does not contribute to asymmetric aging (the twin paradox).