Difference between revisions of "Relativity Theory: Alternative or Fiasco?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
(Errata V4, N2, p. 37). | (Errata V4, N2, p. 37). | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relativity theory alternative fiasco]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|relativity theory alternative fiasco]] |
Latest revision as of 19:53, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relativity Theory: Alternative or Fiasco? |
| Author(s) | Boris I Peshchevitsky |
| Keywords | relativity theory, Lorentz transformation, Galilean transformation, unequally privileged systems |
| Published | 1992 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 103-105 |
Abstract
The unsurmountable obstacles of relativity theory are:
- its derivation requires three, not two postulates
- it can be confirmed by experiment only to the extend of 2/3
- the third, arbitrary postulate introduces local time into the reference frame
- the alternative of the Lorentz transformation is not the Galilean transformation, but a transformation among unequally privileged systems.
(Errata V4, N2, p. 37).
