Difference between revisions of "Natural Decrease of Orbital Eccentricities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The amazing Solar Protuberance Theory gives three strong proofs for the creation of our planets from a huge electromagnetic eruption. I found a 99,98% probability fit between the initial planetary orbit diameters calculated with the theory and the actually observed ones. Since the initial orbits probably were highly eccentric, the question remains whether or not the actual planetary orbital eccentricities can be explained by the theory. This is proven here in different ways.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The amazing Solar Protuberance Theory gives three strong proofs for the creation of our planets from a huge electromagnetic eruption. I found a 99,98% probability fit between the initial planetary orbit diameters calculated with the theory and the actually observed ones. Since the initial orbits probably were highly eccentric, the question remains whether or not the actual planetary orbital eccentricities can be explained by the theory. This is proven here in different ways. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|natural decrease orbital eccentricities]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] | ||
[[Category:Cosmology]] | [[Category:Cosmology]] |
Revision as of 10:43, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Natural Decrease of Orbital Eccentricities |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Thierry De Mees |
Keywords | Gravitomagnetism, planets, spinning stars, black holes, Solar Protuberance Theory |
Published | 2012 |
Journal | General Science Journal |
No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The amazing Solar Protuberance Theory gives three strong proofs for the creation of our planets from a huge electromagnetic eruption. I found a 99,98% probability fit between the initial planetary orbit diameters calculated with the theory and the actually observed ones. Since the initial orbits probably were highly eccentric, the question remains whether or not the actual planetary orbital eccentricities can be explained by the theory. This is proven here in different ways.