Difference between revisions of "The B(3) Field Controversy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|b field controversy]] |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | The B(3) Field Controversy |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Geoffrey Hunter |
Keywords | Stokes Theorem, Myron Evans, B(3) Magnetic Field |
Published | 2000 |
Journal | Apeiron |
Volume | 7 |
Number | 1-2 |
No. of pages | 12 |
Pages | 17-28 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed.