Difference between revisions of "Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Modern analysis of the Boltzmann distribution on the basis of probability theory and Gibbs quantum canonical distribution is proposed. It is shown that the Boltzmann distribution function is neither a reliable result of probability theory nor a consequence of Gibbs quantum canonical distribution. The conclusion is that the Boltzmann distribution function has no physicalstatistical meaning, and the concept “Boltzmann distribution” should be abolished.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Modern analysis of the Boltzmann distribution on the basis of probability theory and Gibbs quantum canonical distribution is proposed. It is shown that the Boltzmann distribution function is neither a reliable result of probability theory nor a consequence of Gibbs quantum canonical distribution. The conclusion is that the Boltzmann distribution function has no physicalstatistical meaning, and the concept “Boltzmann distribution” should be abolished. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|modern analysis boltzmann distribution]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Modern Analysis of the Boltzmann Distribution |
| Author(s) | Temur Z Kalanov |
| Keywords | Boltzmann |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
Abstract
Modern analysis of the Boltzmann distribution on the basis of probability theory and Gibbs quantum canonical distribution is proposed. It is shown that the Boltzmann distribution function is neither a reliable result of probability theory nor a consequence of Gibbs quantum canonical distribution. The conclusion is that the Boltzmann distribution function has no physicalstatistical meaning, and the concept “Boltzmann distribution” should be abolished.
