Difference between revisions of "Why Time is Absolute, and Relative, But Never Universal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The author elaborates upon a materialist view of the absolute and relative nature of time in a simple and (hopefully) clear manner for what has always been a complicated subject. Albert Einstein's relativity of time is defended against those who think of time as a universal absolute that extends beyond its proper frame--the inertial frame. The inertial frame is clarified and elaborated upon to show why the scale of time is naturally, through Newton's Laws of Motion, in congruence to this frame. The conclusion of this paper is that the supposed paradoxes or absurdities of Einstein's relativity theory are really the result of a false conception of time.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The author elaborates upon a materialist view of the absolute and relative nature of time in a simple and (hopefully) clear manner for what has always been a complicated subject. Albert Einstein's relativity of time is defended against those who think of time as a universal absolute that extends beyond its proper frame--the inertial frame. The inertial frame is clarified and elaborated upon to show why the scale of time is naturally, through Newton's Laws of Motion, in congruence to this frame. The conclusion of this paper is that the supposed paradoxes or absurdities of Einstein's relativity theory are really the result of a false conception of time. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time absolute relative universal]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 11:40, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Why Time is Absolute, and Relative, But Never Universal |
Author(s) | Vincent Sauv |
Keywords | Time |
Published | 2005 |
Journal | None |
Abstract
The author elaborates upon a materialist view of the absolute and relative nature of time in a simple and (hopefully) clear manner for what has always been a complicated subject. Albert Einstein's relativity of time is defended against those who think of time as a universal absolute that extends beyond its proper frame--the inertial frame. The inertial frame is clarified and elaborated upon to show why the scale of time is naturally, through Newton's Laws of Motion, in congruence to this frame. The conclusion of this paper is that the supposed paradoxes or absurdities of Einstein's relativity theory are really the result of a false conception of time.