Cite This Page
Bibliographic details for Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
- Page name: Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
- Author: Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors
- Publisher: Natural Philosophy Wiki, .
- Date of last revision: 30 December 2016 02:50 UTC
- Date retrieved: 3 June 2024 03:03 UTC
- Permanent URL: http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873
- Page Version ID: 1873
Citation styles for Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?
APA style
Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?. (2016, December 30). Natural Philosophy Wiki, . Retrieved 03:03, June 3, 2024 from http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873.
MLA style
"Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?." Natural Philosophy Wiki, . 30 Dec 2016, 02:50 UTC. 3 Jun 2024, 03:03 <http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873>.
MHRA style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors, 'Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?', Natural Philosophy Wiki, , 30 December 2016, 02:50 UTC, <http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873> [accessed 3 June 2024]
Chicago style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors, "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?," Natural Philosophy Wiki, , http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873 (accessed June 3, 2024).
CBE/CSE style
Natural Philosophy Wiki contributors. Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? [Internet]. Natural Philosophy Wiki, ; 2016 Dec 30, 02:50 UTC [cited 2024 Jun 3]. Available from: http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873.
Bluebook style
Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional?, http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873 (last visited June 3, 2024).
BibTeX entry
@misc{ wiki:xxx, author = "Natural Philosophy Wiki", title = "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? --- Natural Philosophy Wiki{,} ", year = "2016", url = "http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873", note = "[Online; accessed 3-June-2024]" }
When using the LaTeX package url (\usepackage{url}
somewhere in the preamble) which tends to give much more nicely formatted web addresses, the following may be preferred:
@misc{ wiki:xxx, author = "Natural Philosophy Wiki", title = "Should not the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction Be Three-Dimensional? --- Natural Philosophy Wiki{,} ", year = "2016", url = "\url{http://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Should_not_the_Lorentz-FitzGerald_Contraction_Be_Three-Dimensional%3F&oldid=1873}", note = "[Online; accessed 3-June-2024]" }