Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Was" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- | name = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Abridged Version | image = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Abridged Version 1319.bmp324 bytes (41 words) - 06:39, 2 January 2017
- | title = Was ist und was will die GFWP?189 bytes (24 words) - 11:37, 1 January 2017
- | name = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Volume I, The Scientific Case for Geocentrism | image = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Volume I, The Scientific Case for Geocentrism 916.jpg3 KB (522 words) - 06:39, 2 January 2017
- | title = Stokes was Wrong2 KB (256 words) - 19:57, 1 January 2017
- | name = Einstein Was Not Right ...oks&qid=1219946045&sr=1-2 Einstein Was Not Right]][[Category:Book|einstein was right]]3 KB (391 words) - 06:36, 2 January 2017
- | name = Was Einstein Wrong? | image = Was Einstein Wrong? 351.bmp2 KB (216 words) - 06:56, 2 January 2017
- | title = Was Newton Right After All? ...using light as a synchronizing signal. He has said that the kind of signal was immaterial. Subsequent interpreters have stated that sound signals could ju1 KB (159 words) - 20:12, 1 January 2017
- | title = Why Einstein Was Wrong179 bytes (19 words) - 11:39, 1 January 2017
- | title = Was Edwards Contradicted Experimentally? ...Beckmann's theory. In another "variant" of the experiment, no such effect was detected. It is shown that the experiment failed to satisfy some crucial co718 bytes (86 words) - 11:37, 1 January 2017
- | title = Was Einstein a Berkeleian?697 bytes (83 words) - 20:12, 1 January 2017
- | title = Was vom Einsteinjahr bleibt219 bytes (22 words) - 11:37, 1 January 2017
- | name = Was ist Wissenschaft?: Praktische Wissenschaftslehre ...1-18 Was ist Wissenschaft?: Praktische Wissenschaftslehre]][[Category:Book|was ist wissenschaft praktische wissenschaftslehre]]441 bytes (44 words) - 06:56, 2 January 2017
- | name = Imagine if Einstein was Wrong | image = Imagine if Einstein was Wrong 1609.png1 KB (155 words) - 06:40, 2 January 2017
- | name = Waves Versus Corpuscles : The Revolution That Never Was | image = Waves Versus Corpuscles : The Revolution That Never Was 331.jpg4 KB (695 words) - 06:56, 2 January 2017
- | name = Albert Was Right - God Does Not Play Dice | image = Albert Was Right - God Does Not Play Dice 543.gif2 KB (270 words) - 06:31, 2 January 2017
- | title = Was the Gravitational Deflection of Light Observed? [[Category:Scientific Paper|was gravitational deflection light observed]]963 bytes (121 words) - 20:12, 1 January 2017
- | title = Press Release: Einstein was Partly Right, but Greatly Confusing1 KB (183 words) - 19:50, 1 January 2017
- | title = Space and Time: Who was Right, Einstein or Kant? ...ts of space and time of their ontic counterpart. 3. Kant, on the contrary, was, from a certain point of view, a realist. He accepted the existence of the2 KB (352 words) - 19:55, 1 January 2017
- | name = Elektrischer Strom und Oberfl?chenladungen: was Wilhelm Weber schon vor mehr als 150 Jahren wusste | image = Elektrischer Strom und Oberfl?chenladungen: was Wilhelm Weber schon vor mehr als 150 Jahren wusste 1646.jpg697 bytes (89 words) - 06:36, 2 January 2017
- | title = Was Relativit?tstheorie ist und nicht ist306 bytes (36 words) - 20:12, 1 January 2017
Page text matches
- | name = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Abridged Version | image = Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right, Abridged Version 1319.bmp324 bytes (41 words) - 06:39, 2 January 2017
- | name = Was ist Wissenschaft?: Praktische Wissenschaftslehre ...1-18 Was ist Wissenschaft?: Praktische Wissenschaftslehre]][[Category:Book|was ist wissenschaft praktische wissenschaftslehre]]441 bytes (44 words) - 06:56, 2 January 2017
- ...ium but the end of the old. The new millennium starts with the year 2001. Was everybody wrong? You bet. Has “everybody” been wrong before? Yu980 bytes (146 words) - 10:09, 1 January 2017
- ...ot until 1990 that the general formulation of the universal time postulate was developed by Moon, Spencer and Moon. Today we know that electromagnetic sig1 KB (170 words) - 10:15, 1 January 2017
- | title = Was ist und was will die GFWP?189 bytes (24 words) - 11:37, 1 January 2017
- ...l considered as working fluids for similar power generation systems. There was no choice but to think like a particle.2 KB (230 words) - 20:09, 1 January 2017
- ...to being unit free. The consequence of that act was that fundamental unity was achieved and remained present in the development of theory that followed. T2 KB (306 words) - 11:01, 1 January 2017
- ...alues of redshift or morphological types of objects and locations on lines was visible.935 bytes (120 words) - 19:58, 1 January 2017
- ...verything was red-shifted in our telescopes, it was assumed that the earth was near the point where all mass exploded to start the known universe. Since the conclusion that red-shift was caused by stellar movement, other theories have emerged to explain the red1 KB (173 words) - 17:34, 10 February 2017
- ...as received by this editor via Usenet on 28 August 1989, at a time when it was still quite unknown what the outcome of the experiment would be.530 bytes (71 words) - 10:24, 1 January 2017
- ...king the conference stand out was the facility, the Nativo Lodge. Not only was it an excellent and beautifully appointed building, but its staff members,909 bytes (119 words) - 19:13, 1 January 2017
- ...If an event could be predicted with certainty it was real. The difficulty was that EPR did not discuss the aspect of locality. I would suggest extending2 KB (220 words) - 10:24, 1 January 2017
- ...ed in the 28th November, 1974, issue in "Ariadne's " column, and the other was sent to <em>Electrical Review</em>. Both deserve a considered reply, such a651 bytes (92 words) - 09:52, 1 January 2017
- ...rough to sections regarding ionic bonding I decided to delve further. What was written in the book and what is accepted in Chemistry today is that ionic b981 bytes (147 words) - 10:08, 1 January 2017
- ...the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. But the M-M experiment was in error and Lorentz Transformations were based on error.838 bytes (118 words) - 10:36, 1 January 2017
- | title = Was Edwards Contradicted Experimentally? ...Beckmann's theory. In another "variant" of the experiment, no such effect was detected. It is shown that the experiment failed to satisfy some crucial co718 bytes (86 words) - 11:37, 1 January 2017
- ...a book about a sacred mushroom that could make a person telepathic, but he was yet to achieve widespread acclaim. That would occur, virtually overnight, a925 bytes (143 words) - 19:24, 1 January 2017
- ...orefront of those discoveries was Nikola Tesla, and one of his discoveries was radio communication with Extraterrestrials. I will be discussing the intell1 KB (199 words) - 19:32, 1 January 2017
- ...ected EE programs in the world. From the beginning, a conscientious effort was made to base it on a foundation of science. It has been guided by the speci Arguably the most stunning and significant lecture in modern history was presented one spring evening, more than a century ago, at Columbia Universi2 KB (233 words) - 19:58, 1 January 2017
- ...optical gravimeter was suggested for the forecast of major earthquakes. It was determined that the Moon phases have impact on long-period deflections with1 KB (158 words) - 19:42, 1 January 2017