Difference between revisions of "?Einstein Reconsidered? (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
An opinion is expressed that special relativity would be named the Lorentz-Poincare-Einstein-Minkowski relativity theory. It is noted again that these two known conclusions of general relativity contradict the results of experiments with atomic clocks and each other. | An opinion is expressed that special relativity would be named the Lorentz-Poincare-Einstein-Minkowski relativity theory. It is noted again that these two known conclusions of general relativity contradict the results of experiments with atomic clocks and each other. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|einstein reconsidered infinite energy discussion]] |
[[Category:New Energy]] | [[Category:New Energy]] | ||
Revision as of 10:18, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | ?Einstein Reconsidered? (Re: an Infinite Energy Discussion) |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vyacheslav N Streltsov |
| Keywords | special relativity, general relativity, Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein, Minkowski, Infinite Energy. |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | None |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 6 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
An opinion is expressed that special relativity would be named the Lorentz-Poincare-Einstein-Minkowski relativity theory. It is noted again that these two known conclusions of general relativity contradict the results of experiments with atomic clocks and each other.
