Difference between revisions of "A Classical Alternative to STR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way light-speed to vary, their average speed being invariant.<br />[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way light-speed to vary, their average speed being invariant.<br /> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|classical alternative str]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Classical Alternative to STR |
| Author(s) | Mogens True Wegener |
| Keywords | Special Relativity |
| Published | 1995 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 8 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 427-433 |
Abstract
The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way light-speed to vary, their average speed being invariant.
