Difference between revisions of "A Classical Alternative to STR"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way&nbsp;light-speed to vary, their average&nbsp;speed being invariant.<br />[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way&nbsp;light-speed to vary, their average&nbsp;speed being invariant.<br />
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|classical alternative str]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Relativity|classical alternative str]]

Latest revision as of 19:14, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title A Classical Alternative to STR
Author(s) Mogens True Wegener
Keywords Special Relativity
Published 1995
Journal Physics Essays
Volume 8
Number 3
Pages 427-433

Abstract

The present paper is dedicated to the honour of Ths.E. Phipps j. It is argued that Special Relativity (SR) should be rejected in favour of a Classical Alternative (AR) based on the invariance of proper time; this involves a modification of Einstein's second postulate which allows the one-way light-speed to vary, their average speed being invariant.