Difference between revisions of "A Coherent Reframing of the Master Equations of Electromagnetic Theory"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The electromagnetic expressions for capacitance, inductance, and resistance are reformulated in terms of the index of refraction, n, of the dielectric material surrounding the two conductors of the so-called electric circuit together with the vacuum speed of light, c, and vacuum wave impedance, Zo. The ?quantities-per-unit-length? concept is shown to be closer to the physics than is the ?lumped-element? concept. The critical features of three different theories- of alleged electric circuits, of transmission lines, and of optics, are shown to be aspects of a single, coherent opto-electromagnetic theory of TEM Wave Electrodynamics. A necessary part of putting this show in order requires dismissing the actors known as electric permittivity, magnetic permeability, electric current, magnetic flux, voltage, and electric charge. These are the misdirected characters starring in a drama about static fields and electric currents that never were. | + | The electromagnetic expressions for capacitance, inductance, and resistance are reformulated in terms of the index of refraction, n, of the dielectric material surrounding the two conductors of the so-called electric circuit together with the vacuum speed of light, c, and vacuum wave impedance, Zo. The ?quantities-per-unit-length? concept is shown to be closer to the physics than is the ?lumped-element? concept. The critical features of three different theories- of alleged electric circuits, of transmission lines, and of optics, are shown to be aspects of a single, coherent opto-electromagnetic theory of TEM Wave Electrodynamics. A necessary part of putting this show in order requires dismissing the actors known as electric permittivity, magnetic permeability, electric current, magnetic flux, voltage, and electric charge. These are the misdirected characters starring in a drama about static fields and electric currents that never were. |
| − | [[Category:Electrodynamics]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|coherent reframing master equations electromagnetic theory]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Electrodynamics|coherent reframing master equations electromagnetic theory]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Coherent Reframing of the Master Equations of Electromagnetic Theory |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Forrest Bishop |
| Keywords | refractive index capacitance inductance |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 8 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The electromagnetic expressions for capacitance, inductance, and resistance are reformulated in terms of the index of refraction, n, of the dielectric material surrounding the two conductors of the so-called electric circuit together with the vacuum speed of light, c, and vacuum wave impedance, Zo. The ?quantities-per-unit-length? concept is shown to be closer to the physics than is the ?lumped-element? concept. The critical features of three different theories- of alleged electric circuits, of transmission lines, and of optics, are shown to be aspects of a single, coherent opto-electromagnetic theory of TEM Wave Electrodynamics. A necessary part of putting this show in order requires dismissing the actors known as electric permittivity, magnetic permeability, electric current, magnetic flux, voltage, and electric charge. These are the misdirected characters starring in a drama about static fields and electric currents that never were.
