Difference between revisions of "A Local-Real Model of EPR Correlations"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|local-real model epr correlations]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|local-real model epr correlations]] | ||
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|local-real model epr correlations]] |
Latest revision as of 19:16, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | A Local-Real Model of EPR Correlations |
Author(s) | Al F Kracklauer |
Keywords | bell's theorem |
Published | 2009 |
Journal | None |
Abstract
Nowadays Bell's theorem is commonly considered to "prove" that at a fundamental level, Nature exploits some kine of "nonlocal" (i.e., faster than light) interaction. This 'theorem" states that a certain statistic must remain below |2| for all local-real (in other words: classical) theories. This is very problematic for two reasons: One, it implies that Quantum Mechanics is in fundamental contradiction with Special Relativity, and two, there are many examples of circumstances in which the subject statistic for fully classical phenomena exceeds the 'Bell' limit. This writer and the read and collaborators have presented models for EPR experiments; but, they have been criticized for involving unphysical/improbable mechanisms. I shall present a new model that remedies these defects, explains all the data taken in EPR experiments and makes a falsiable prediction. It is based only on the photoelectric effect. My main conclusion is: there is no need for nonlocality and non-reality to account for quantum effects.