Difference between revisions of "A New Logic for Quantum Mechanics?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The debate concerning the status of a logic adequate for Quantum Mechanics (Q.M.) continues, fifty years after the formulation of the so called "quantum logic" by Hans Reichenback. The two dominant theses in this debate, are the following: 1) Quantum logic-a three valued logic- is the apparatus suitable for Q.M. 2) Classical, two valued logic is sufficient for Q.M. There is no quantum logic, but only a propositional calculus expressing the specific character of quantum mechanical phenomena. However as I will try to show, a third answer to this question is not impossible. | + | The debate concerning the status of a logic adequate for Quantum Mechanics (Q.M.) continues, fifty years after the formulation of the so called "quantum logic" by Hans Reichenback. The two dominant theses in this debate, are the following: 1) Quantum logic-a three valued logic- is the apparatus suitable for Q.M. 2) Classical, two valued logic is sufficient for Q.M. There is no quantum logic, but only a propositional calculus expressing the specific character of quantum mechanical phenomena. However as I will try to show, a third answer to this question is not impossible. |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|new logic quantum mechanics]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|new logic quantum mechanics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:17, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A New Logic for Quantum Mechanics? |
| Author(s) | Eftichios Bitsakis |
| Keywords | logic, quantum mechanics, three-valued logic, calculus |
| Published | 1994 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 475-484 |
Abstract
The debate concerning the status of a logic adequate for Quantum Mechanics (Q.M.) continues, fifty years after the formulation of the so called "quantum logic" by Hans Reichenback. The two dominant theses in this debate, are the following: 1) Quantum logic-a three valued logic- is the apparatus suitable for Q.M. 2) Classical, two valued logic is sufficient for Q.M. There is no quantum logic, but only a propositional calculus expressing the specific character of quantum mechanical phenomena. However as I will try to show, a third answer to this question is not impossible.
