Difference between revisions of "An Absolute Theory for the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|absolute theory electrodynamics moving bodies]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|absolute theory electrodynamics moving bodies]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|absolute theory electrodynamics moving bodies]] |
Latest revision as of 19:16, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | An Absolute Theory for the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies |
| Author(s) | Delbert J Larsen |
| Keywords | Absolute Space, Electrodynamics |
| Published | 1999 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
An axiomatic set employing clock retardation alone is shown to be sufficient to derive the Lorentz kinematic transformations; the Fitzgerald length contraction is not required. Since the kinematic transformations lead solely and directly to the electrodynamic transformation, this paper presents the third axiomatic set (the others are due to Lorentz and Einstein) consistent with presently accepted electrodynamic theory. The theory proposed herein assumes classical concepts for space and time; Galilean relativity and an aether are assumed. The present experimental evidence relative to space-time theory is reviewed, and its relevance to the three competing axiomatic sets is discussed. It is shown that the new theory requires the Michelson-Morley experiment to be explained by a node enforcement hypothesis. Shortcomings in the Einstein theory include measurements of EPR phenomena. while shortcomings of the Lorentz theory may result from the tests due to Sherwin. Two new tests are proposed that could experimentally prove which axiomatic set best represents reality.
