Difference between revisions of "Assessing Consequences of Overextended Secret Reviewing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
We learn too much and understand too little,<br />Yet understanding comes from learning<br />So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on. | We learn too much and understand too little,<br />Yet understanding comes from learning<br />So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|assessing consequences overextended secret reviewing]] |
Latest revision as of 10:03, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Assessing Consequences of Overextended Secret Reviewing |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Evert Jan Post |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 7 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 382-383 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
We learn too much and understand too little,
Yet understanding comes from learning
So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on.
