Difference between revisions of "Atomic Clocks Coming and Going"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The authors of the Hafele and Keating atomic clock experiment in their theorical discussion, ignore detailed and fully documented criticisms of Einstein's relativity theory which have been made and have not been refuted.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The authors of the Hafele and Keating atomic clock experiment in their theorical discussion, ignore detailed and fully documented criticisms of Einstein's relativity theory which have been made and have not been refuted. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|atomic clocks coming going]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:04, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Atomic Clocks Coming and Going |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Louis Essen |
| Keywords | clocks, time, relativity, caesium clocks |
| Published | 1977 |
| Journal | Creation Research Society Quarterly |
| No. of pages | 1 |
| Pages | 46 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The authors of the Hafele and Keating atomic clock experiment in their theorical discussion, ignore detailed and fully documented criticisms of Einstein's relativity theory which have been made and have not been refuted.
