Difference between revisions of "Atomic Energy and Academic Fraud: The Case of the Hydrogen Atom"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|atomic energy academic fraud case hydrogen atom]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|atomic energy academic fraud case hydrogen atom]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|atomic energy academic fraud case hydrogen atom]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Atomic Energy and Academic Fraud: The Case of the Hydrogen Atom |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Joe Alexander Nahhas |
| Keywords | hydrogen, atom, ionization, -13.6, relativity, quantum |
| Published | 1979 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 5 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
If you study 25 years and get a phd in atomic physics then you can use quantum relativistic mechanics used by nobel prize winners physicists to describe the bound state of the hydrogen atom which happened to be -13.6 electron volt, the alternative is dumping relativistic mechanics and use high school Newton's - Kepler's equations and get better results; better results because you can get the -13.6 electron volts and not do ellaborate rigging of nature and do not have dump your intelligence and accept make-believe space-to timeback to space jumping travel or quantum fraud. Here is how the ionization energy of -13.6 is calculated from Newton's-Kepler's equations
