Difference between revisions of "Big Bang or Full Stop?"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Reprinted in Proceedings of the NPA, V2, pp. 67-79 as "Full Stop or Big Bang?" | Reprinted in Proceedings of the NPA, V2, pp. 67-79 as "Full Stop or Big Bang?" | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|big bang stop]] |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|big bang stop]] |
Latest revision as of 19:21, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Big Bang or Full Stop? |
| Author(s) | Alphonsus G Kelly |
| Keywords | Big Bang, Hubble's Law |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 106-108 |
Abstract
?Hubble's Law' states that the further away a galaxy is, the faster it is receding from Earth. But, the red shift of light from galaxies in-dicates their recession speeds, at the time of emission of the light. The correct interpretation is, therefore, that the farther away a galaxy was at the time of emission of the light, the faster it was recessing. The nearest galaxies give us the most recent information; the more recent the information, the slower the recession. A logical conclusion is that the recession of galaxies has decreased gradually to a present steady state. This means that the ?Big Bang' theory is not sustainable and that the Universe is not expanding.
Reprinted in Proceedings of the NPA, V2, pp. 67-79 as "Full Stop or Big Bang?"
