Difference between revisions of "Burak Polat"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
* The well known Hertzian formulation of electromagnetism where velocity vector of motion is a function of time, constitute a special case of the frame indifferent formulation  
 
* The well known Hertzian formulation of electromagnetism where velocity vector of motion is a function of time, constitute a special case of the frame indifferent formulation  
 
* I avoid any contradicting alternative theory for moving bodies (especially Special and General Theories of Relavity) in the context of macroscobic electromagnetism.  
 
* I avoid any contradicting alternative theory for moving bodies (especially Special and General Theories of Relavity) in the context of macroscobic electromagnetism.  
* When Maxwell's Equations are in consideration, relativistic theories are '''unnecessary, insufficient and incorrect''' as they yield results that contradict with well established experiments in the context of Electrical Engineering.   
+
* When Maxwell's Equations are in consideration, relativistic theories are '''unnecessary, insufficient and incorrect''' as they suggest results that contradict with well established experiments in the context of Electrical Engineering.   
 
*  '''Yes:''' General Invariance  '''No:''' General Covariance
 
*  '''Yes:''' General Invariance  '''No:''' General Covariance
 
*  '''Yes:''' Frame Indifference  '''No:''' Form Invariance
 
*  '''Yes:''' Frame Indifference  '''No:''' Form Invariance

Revision as of 09:49, 14 December 2018

Burak Polat
Burak Polat
Born (1971-12-10)December 10, 1971
Residence Istanbul, Turkey
Nationality Turkish
Known for Electromagnetism, antennas, propagation, radiation, scattering, applied mathematics, mathematical physics
Scientific career
Fields Professor, Electrical Engineer

Personal Web Site: www.aburakpolat.com Institutional Web Site: http://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/abpolat/

Physical World View: As a Professor of Theoretical Electromagnetism my personal perspective on macroscobic electromagnetic theory can be outlined as follows:

  • Neither time nor speed is an absolute physical quantity.
  • The laws of macroscobic electromagnetism as described by Maxwell’s Equations of stationary media are frame indifferent and recognize all frame indifferent axioms, postulates, principles and laws of other disciplines that constitute Newtonian Continuum Mechanics in Euclidean Space. This is another way to saying that Eulerian and Lagrangian frame observers are in full agreement with

(1) the nature (or state) of any physical quantity (2) the structural form and content of any physical law, and (3) the result of any measurement taken in the two frames.

  • Convection currents mean material displacement. Therefore they are not included in what I understand from electromagnetics of stationary media described by Maxwell's Equations. They only appear properly in the context of Frame Indifferent Theory of Electromagnetism
  • Static sources in motion do not radiate electromagnetic energy. What happens is that the field lines follow the arbitrary motion of the source as a whole, without any deformation in shape.
  • The well known Hertzian formulation of electromagnetism where velocity vector of motion is a function of time, constitute a special case of the frame indifferent formulation
  • I avoid any contradicting alternative theory for moving bodies (especially Special and General Theories of Relavity) in the context of macroscobic electromagnetism.
  • When Maxwell's Equations are in consideration, relativistic theories are unnecessary, insufficient and incorrect as they suggest results that contradict with well established experiments in the context of Electrical Engineering.
  • Yes: General Invariance No: General Covariance
  • Yes: Frame Indifference No: Form Invariance
  • Yes: Newtonian/Euclidean Space and Time No: Minkowski Space-Time
  • Yes: Frame Indifferent Electromagnetic Theory that Covers Hertz-Heaviside Electrdynamics No: Maxwell-Minkowski Electrodynamics and General Relativity Theory
  • Yes: Principle of Material Frame Indifference No: Principle of General Space-Time Covariance
  • In that regard if a relativistic improvement of Frame Indifferent Electromagnetics would ever be required, say in cosmological scale, then I believe it must be constructed in a way as to yield the frame indifferent field equations exactly in the nonrelativistic limiting cases.

For my contributions on the subject matter please refer to the list of related published papers available at http://aburakpolat.com/research-papers-in-specific-areas/