Difference between revisions of "Burak Polat"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
}}
 
}}
 
<b> Personal Web Site:</b>  www.aburakpolat.com
 
<b> Personal Web Site:</b>  www.aburakpolat.com
<b>Education:</b>       * 10/1982 - 07/1989: Kadikoy Anatolian High School, Istanbul
+
<b> Institutional Web Site:</b> http://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/abpolat/
* 10/1989 - 07/1993: B.Sc., Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, B.Sc. Thesis: A Hybrid Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Related With Cylindrical Bodies Buried in a Slab, Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Mithat IDEMEN
 
* 10/1993 - 02/1995: M.Sc., Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, M.Sc. Thesis: Wave Propagation Through Linearly Tapered Homogeneous Slab Waveguides, Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ercan TOPUZ
 
* 03/1995 - 03/1997: Ph.D., Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Ph.D. Thesis: Diffraction of Acoustic Waves by a Semi-infinite Cylindrical Impedance Pipe of Certain Wall Thickness, Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Alinur BUYUKAKSOY
 
  
<b>Academic Positions:</b>      * 07/1994 - 02/1996: Research Assistant, Electronics Engineering Department, Gebze Institute of Technology
+
<b>Physical World View:</b>       
* 06/1996 - 06/1997: Research Assistant, Electronics Engineering Department, Istanbul University
+
As a Professor of Theoretical Electromagnetism my personal perspective on macroscobic electromagnetic theory can be outlined as follows:
* 06/1997 - 11/1998: Assistant Professor, Electronics Engineering Department, Istanbul University
+
* The laws of macroscobic electromagnetism as described by Maxwell’s Equations of stationary media are frame indifferent and recognize all frame indifferent axioms, postulates, principles and laws of other disciplines that constitute Newtonian Continuum Mechanics in Euclidean Space. This is another way to saying that Eulerian and Lagrangian frame observers are in full agreement with
* 07/1997 - 11/1998: Military Service (compulsory)
+
(1) the nature (or state) of any physical quantity
* 11/1998 - 07/2000: Associate Professor, Electronics Engineering Department, Istanbul University
+
(2) the structural form and content of any physical law, and
* 09/2000 - 09/2001: Assistant Professor, Antenna and Electromagnetics Group, Oersted-DTU, Section for Electromagnetic Systems, Technical University of Denmark
+
(3) the result of any measurement taken
* 12/2001 - 01/2003: Senior Researcher, Electronic Systems Group (ESG), Information Technologies Research Institute (BTAE), Marmara Research Center (MAM ), The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
+
in the two frames.
* 05/2003 - 10/2005: Associate Professor, Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
+
* Convection currents  mean  material displacement. Therefore they are not included in what I understand from electromagnetics of  stationary media described by Maxwell's Equations. They only appear properly in the context of Frame Indifferent Theory of Electromagnetism
* 10/2005 - 10/2010: Professor, Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University
+
* Static sources in motion do not radiate electromagnetic energy. What happens is that the field lines follow the arbitrary motion of the source as a whole, without any deformation in shape.
* 08/2007 - 08/2009: Professor, Mathematics Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Uludag University
+
* The well known Hertzian formulation of electromagnetism where velocity vector of motion is a function of time, constitute a special case of the frame indifferent formulation
* 10/2010 - ongoing: Professor, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Trakya University
+
* I avoid any contradicting alternative theory for moving bodies (especially Special and General Theories of Relavity) in the context of macroscobic electromagnetism.
 +
* When Maxwell's Equations are in consideration, relativistic theories are '''unnecessary, insufficient and incorrect''' as they yield results that contradict with well established experiments in the context of Electrical Engineering
 +
* Yes: General Invariance  No: General Covariance
 +
    Yes: Frame Indifference  No: Form Invariance
 +
    Yes: Newtonian Space and Time  No: Minkowski Space-Time
 +
    Yes: Frame Indifferent Electromagnetic Theory that COvers Hertz-Heaviside Electrdynamics  No: Maxwell-Minkowski Electrodynamics and General Relativity Theory
 +
    Yes: Principle of Material Frame Indifference  No: Principle of General Space-Time Covariance
  
<b>Administrative Positions:</b>      * 05/2003 - 03/2005: Co-Director, ITU-CSCRS: Center for Satellite Communications and Remote Sensing, Istanbul Technical University
+
* In that regard if a relativistic improvement of Frame Indifferent Electromagnetics would ever be required, say in cosmological scale, then I believe it must be constructed in a way as to yield the frame indifferent field equations exactly in the nonrelativistic limiting cases.
* 10/2005 - ongoing: Head, Electromagnetic Fields and Microwave Technique Division, Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University
 
* 10/2005 - 08/2007: Erasmus Program Coordinator, Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University
 
* 07/2006 - 03/2007: Vice Head,Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University
 
* 10/2010 - ongoing: Founding Chair, Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Trakya University
 
 
 
<b>Visiting Positions:</b>      * 01/2000 - 09/2000: Visiting Researcher, Computational Electromagnetics Research Group, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept., Clemson University, SC, USA. Invited by: [http://www.ece.clemson.edu/ece/pearson.shtml Prof. Dr. L. Wilson Pearson]
 
* 07/2004 - 10/2004: Visiting Researcher, Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab.,Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept., Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA. Invited by: [http://www.ece.concordia.ca/~trueman/ Prof. Dr. Christopher W. Trueman]
 
* 09/2007: Erasmus Lecturer, Institute of Mathematics, University of Rzeszow, POLAND. Invited by: Prof. Dr. Andrzej Kaminski
 
* 02/2008: Visiting Researcher, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Dept., Ben Gurion University of the Negev, ISRAEL. Invited by: Prof. Dr. Dan Censor
 
 
 
<b>Other Appointments:</b>      * 09/2009: Associate Editor, [http://www.sumam.selcuk.edu.tr/publications.html Selcuk Journal of Applied Mathematics]
 
  
 +
For details please refer to my published papers in the area at
 +
http://aburakpolat.com/research-papers-in-specific-areas/
  
 
[[Category:Scientist|Polat Burak]]
 
[[Category:Scientist|Polat Burak]]

Revision as of 09:21, 14 December 2018

Burak Polat
Burak Polat
Born (1971-12-10)December 10, 1971
Residence Istanbul, Turkey
Nationality Turkish
Known for Electromagnetism, antennas, propagation, radiation, scattering, applied mathematics, mathematical physics
Scientific career
Fields Professor, Electrical Engineer

Personal Web Site: www.aburakpolat.com Institutional Web Site: http://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/abpolat/

Physical World View: As a Professor of Theoretical Electromagnetism my personal perspective on macroscobic electromagnetic theory can be outlined as follows:

  • The laws of macroscobic electromagnetism as described by Maxwell’s Equations of stationary media are frame indifferent and recognize all frame indifferent axioms, postulates, principles and laws of other disciplines that constitute Newtonian Continuum Mechanics in Euclidean Space. This is another way to saying that Eulerian and Lagrangian frame observers are in full agreement with

(1) the nature (or state) of any physical quantity (2) the structural form and content of any physical law, and (3) the result of any measurement taken in the two frames.

  • Convection currents mean material displacement. Therefore they are not included in what I understand from electromagnetics of stationary media described by Maxwell's Equations. They only appear properly in the context of Frame Indifferent Theory of Electromagnetism
  • Static sources in motion do not radiate electromagnetic energy. What happens is that the field lines follow the arbitrary motion of the source as a whole, without any deformation in shape.
  • The well known Hertzian formulation of electromagnetism where velocity vector of motion is a function of time, constitute a special case of the frame indifferent formulation
  • I avoid any contradicting alternative theory for moving bodies (especially Special and General Theories of Relavity) in the context of macroscobic electromagnetism.
  • When Maxwell's Equations are in consideration, relativistic theories are unnecessary, insufficient and incorrect as they yield results that contradict with well established experiments in the context of Electrical Engineering.
  • Yes: General Invariance No: General Covariance
   Yes: Frame Indifference  No: Form Invariance
   Yes: Newtonian Space and Time  No: Minkowski Space-Time
   Yes: Frame Indifferent Electromagnetic Theory that COvers Hertz-Heaviside Electrdynamics  No: Maxwell-Minkowski Electrodynamics and General Relativity Theory
   Yes: Principle of Material Frame Indifference  No: Principle of General Space-Time Covariance
  • In that regard if a relativistic improvement of Frame Indifferent Electromagnetics would ever be required, say in cosmological scale, then I believe it must be constructed in a way as to yield the frame indifferent field equations exactly in the nonrelativistic limiting cases.

For details please refer to my published papers in the area at http://aburakpolat.com/research-papers-in-specific-areas/