Difference between revisions of "Contesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|contesting testing infinitesimal lorentz transformations associated equivalence principle]] |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Contesting and Testing Infinitesimal Lorentz Transformations and the Associated Equivalence Principle |
| Author(s) | Ronald R Hatch |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 23 |
Abstract
Evidence is presented to show that infinitesimal Lorentz transformations (ILTs) contradict the ?clock hypothesis? that acceleration affects the clock rate only indirectly through the resultant velocity. But the clock hypothesis has substantial supporting experimental evidence. It is also shown that the equivalence principle, upon which the general relativity is based, depends on the validity of ILTs. In addition, a fairly simple M?ssbauer experiment on the International Space Station is suggested, which would clearly indicate whether or not the ILTs are valid. However, it is also shown that a careful consideration of clocks on the earth already provides equivalent experimental data, which indicates that ILTs are invalid.
