Difference between revisions of "Criticism on the Foundations of Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest. | Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|criticism foundations relativity]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|criticism foundations relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 19:25, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Criticism on the Foundations of Relativity |
| Author(s) | Jean-Jacques Gruffat |
| Keywords | Relativity |
| Published | 1996 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 315-323 |
Abstract
It is shown that the Lorentz assumption of a length contraction with a ratio (1-B2)1/2 in the movement direction of moving bodies is not the only one which can explain the Michelson-Morley experiment within its usual interpretation.
Inconsistencies between a corpuscular nature of light and some observations are well known. However, they disappear when it is assumed that a photon is not emitted inside the light source bur in a medium at rest.
