Difference between revisions of "Dangerous Effects of the Incomprehensibility in Microphysics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Einstein said [1] the most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible". On the other hand Bohr wrote [2] "...I advocated a point of view conveniently termed complementarity, suited to embrace the characteristic features of individuality of quantum phenomena, and at the same time to clarify the peculiar aspects of the observational problem in the field of experience. For this purpose, it is decisive to recognize that, <em>however far the phenomena transcend the scope of classical physical explanation, the account of all evidence must be expressed in classical terms".</em> | + | Einstein said [1] the most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible". On the other hand Bohr wrote [2] "...I advocated a point of view conveniently termed complementarity, suited to embrace the characteristic features of individuality of quantum phenomena, and at the same time to clarify the peculiar aspects of the observational problem in the field of experience. For this purpose, it is decisive to recognize that, <em>however far the phenomena transcend the scope of classical physical explanation, the account of all evidence must be expressed in classical terms".</em> |
| − | [[Category:Unified Theory]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|dangerous effects incomprehensibility microphysics]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Unified Theory|dangerous effects incomprehensibility microphysics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Dangerous Effects of the Incomprehensibility in Microphysics |
| Author(s) | Jenner Barretto Bastos-Filho |
| Keywords | microphysics, quantum mechanics, dangerous effects, incomprehensible, phenomena |
| Published | 1994 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 485-492 |
Abstract
Einstein said [1] the most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible". On the other hand Bohr wrote [2] "...I advocated a point of view conveniently termed complementarity, suited to embrace the characteristic features of individuality of quantum phenomena, and at the same time to clarify the peculiar aspects of the observational problem in the field of experience. For this purpose, it is decisive to recognize that, however far the phenomena transcend the scope of classical physical explanation, the account of all evidence must be expressed in classical terms".
