Difference between revisions of "Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
This paper analyzes data from GPS, the Hafele-Keating Experiment and muon decay measurements that are claimed to support Special Relativity’s claim of time dilation. It is found that this data actually does not support Special Relativity and in some cases is evidence against Special Relativity. The “time dilation” data is also analyzed in terms of its historical development and in terms of the Twin Paradox. | This paper analyzes data from GPS, the Hafele-Keating Experiment and muon decay measurements that are claimed to support Special Relativity’s claim of time dilation. It is found that this data actually does not support Special Relativity and in some cases is evidence against Special Relativity. The “time dilation” data is also analyzed in terms of its historical development and in terms of the Twin Paradox. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:13, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Data That Allegedly Proves Special Relativity Disproves It |
| Author(s) | Nick Percival |
| Keywords | time dilation, clock retardation, special relativity, Lorentz relativity |
| Published | 2013 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 5 |
Abstract
This paper analyzes data from GPS, the Hafele-Keating Experiment and muon decay measurements that are claimed to support Special Relativity’s claim of time dilation. It is found that this data actually does not support Special Relativity and in some cases is evidence against Special Relativity. The “time dilation” data is also analyzed in terms of its historical development and in terms of the Twin Paradox.
[[Category:Scientific Paper|]]
