Difference between revisions of "Design of the Universe - Part I: Redefinition of the Unification Problem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|design universe - redefinition unification problem]] |
Latest revision as of 10:14, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Design of the Universe - Part I: Redefinition of the Unification Problem |
Author(s) | Robert J Heaston |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 1998 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 9 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 75-79 |
Abstract
The so-called standard model has a major shortcoming in that it introduces each of the fundamental forces differently. This criticism is overcome by defining the concept of force mathematically with a generic field theory. The result is the redefinition of the so-called unification problem, which easily resolves a number of criticisms of the standard model. This is the first of a three-part paper. Subsequent Parts describe the impact of the approach taken in Part I.