Difference between revisions of "First Experimental Proof of "Not" Constant Velocity of Light"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
Binary stars Emitts light toward Earth and light aberrations measurements were found to be spin orientation dependent and the correct answer is [2 x orbit velocity of center of mass] +/- spin velocity of primary star +/- spin velocity of secondary star indicating light aberrations measurements are spin velocity orientation dependent confirming velocity additions and subtrations to light speed and contradicting the principle of the constant velocity of light. 
 
Binary stars Emitts light toward Earth and light aberrations measurements were found to be spin orientation dependent and the correct answer is [2 x orbit velocity of center of mass] +/- spin velocity of primary star +/- spin velocity of secondary star indicating light aberrations measurements are spin velocity orientation dependent confirming velocity additions and subtrations to light speed and contradicting the principle of the constant velocity of light. 
  
[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|experimental proof constant velocity light]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 10:25, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title First Experimental Proof of \"Not\" Constant Velocity of Light
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Joe Alexander Nahhas
Keywords relativity, principle of constant velocity of light speed
Published 1983
Journal None
No. of pages 7

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Binary stars Emitts light toward Earth and light aberrations measurements were found to be spin orientation dependent and the correct answer is [2 x orbit velocity of center of mass] +/- spin velocity of primary star +/- spin velocity of secondary star indicating light aberrations measurements are spin velocity orientation dependent confirming velocity additions and subtrations to light speed and contradicting the principle of the constant velocity of light.