Difference between revisions of "From Relativistic Paradoxes to Absolute Space and Time Physics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Contradicting Maxwell, Larmor, Heaviside, Hertz and others, Voigt (1887), Lorentz (1904) and Einstein (1905) introduced the hypothesis that Maxwell's equations and the electromagnetic (EM) wave equations hold in this form not only in the ether frame S<sup>o</sup> ('''0''') but in all other inertial frames (IF) S('''w''') with ether velocities '''w '''[] '''0''', too. This proposition is physically equivalent to the questionable assumptions: (i) an EM wave carrier or ether (vacuum substratum) does not exist, (j) the velocity of a light signal has the same value <em>c</em> in all '''IF'''s, and (k) electrodynamic phenomena are relative to the observer (nonexistence of a preferred or substratum frame S<sup>o</sup>).[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Contradicting Maxwell, Larmor, Heaviside, Hertz and others, Voigt (1887), Lorentz (1904) and Einstein (1905) introduced the hypothesis that Maxwell's equations and the electromagnetic (EM) wave equations hold in this form not only in the ether frame S<sup>o</sup> ('''0''') but in all other inertial frames (IF) S('''w''') with ether velocities '''w '''[] '''0''', too. This proposition is physically equivalent to the questionable assumptions: (i) an EM wave carrier or ether (vacuum substratum) does not exist, (j) the velocity of a light signal has the same value <em>c</em> in all '''IF'''s, and (k) electrodynamic phenomena are relative to the observer (nonexistence of a preferred or substratum frame S<sup>o</sup>). |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic paradoxes absolute space time physics]] | ||
[[Category:Aether]] | [[Category:Aether]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:26, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | From Relativistic Paradoxes to Absolute Space and Time Physics |
Author(s) | Horst E Wilhelm |
Keywords | relativistic paradoxes, absolute space and time physics, velocities, electrodynamic wave, ether |
Published | 1994 |
Journal | None |
Pages | 171-179 |
Abstract
Contradicting Maxwell, Larmor, Heaviside, Hertz and others, Voigt (1887), Lorentz (1904) and Einstein (1905) introduced the hypothesis that Maxwell's equations and the electromagnetic (EM) wave equations hold in this form not only in the ether frame So (0) but in all other inertial frames (IF) S(w) with ether velocities w [] 0, too. This proposition is physically equivalent to the questionable assumptions: (i) an EM wave carrier or ether (vacuum substratum) does not exist, (j) the velocity of a light signal has the same value c in all IFs, and (k) electrodynamic phenomena are relative to the observer (nonexistence of a preferred or substratum frame So).