Difference between revisions of "General Relativity Theory: Confusion of Physics; The Case of GG Orion Binary Stars Motion"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
General Relativity Theory is mot good emough the simplest problem in physics and that would be the two body problem or two ecplising detached binary stars because the theory failed to account correctly for the "apparent" axial rotations of the orbit of binary stars and it claims additional fictional forces  and four dimensional universes without proof when the whole thing is a case of centuries of astronomy and astronomers still can not read their telescopes    [[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
General Relativity Theory is mot good emough the simplest problem in physics and that would be the two body problem or two ecplising detached binary stars because the theory failed to account correctly for the "apparent" axial rotations of the orbit of binary stars and it claims additional fictional forces  and four dimensional universes without proof when the whole thing is a case of centuries of astronomy and astronomers still can not read their telescopes    
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|general relativity theory confusion physics case gg orion binary stars motion]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 10:28, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title General Relativity Theory: Confusion of Physics; The Case of GG Orion Binary Stars Motion
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Joe Alexander Nahhas
Keywords Relativity, GG-Orion; Binary-Stars; Apsidal, motion, mercury, venus, pression.perihelion
Published 2000
Journal None
No. of pages 8

Read the full paper here

Abstract

General Relativity Theory is mot good emough the simplest problem in physics and that would be the two body problem or two ecplising detached binary stars because the theory failed to account correctly for the "apparent" axial rotations of the orbit of binary stars and it claims additional fictional forces  and four dimensional universes without proof when the whole thing is a case of centuries of astronomy and astronomers still can not read their telescopes