Difference between revisions of "Have We Abandoned the Physical Theory of Nature?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The Greek philosophers showed that in the study of Nature there were three fundamentally different theories which could be put forward to account for the obvious and extensive characteristics of stuff and change: the physical, the mathematical, and the functional theories...[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The Greek philosophers showed that in the study of Nature there were three fundamentally different theories which could be put forward to account for the obvious and extensive characteristics of stuff and change: the physical, the mathematical, and the functional theories... |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|abandoned physical theory nature]] |
Latest revision as of 10:31, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Have We Abandoned the Physical Theory of Nature? |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Burniston Brown |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 1956 |
Journal | Science Progress |
Volume | 44 |
No. of pages | 16 |
Pages | 619-634 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The Greek philosophers showed that in the study of Nature there were three fundamentally different theories which could be put forward to account for the obvious and extensive characteristics of stuff and change: the physical, the mathematical, and the functional theories...