Difference between revisions of "If Sagnac and Michelson-Gale, Why Not Michelson-Morley?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|sagnac michelson-gale michelson-morley]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|sagnac michelson-gale michelson-morley]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|sagnac michelson-gale michelson-morley]] |
Latest revision as of 19:37, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | If Sagnac and Michelson-Gale, Why Not Michelson-Morley? |
| Author(s) | Howard C Hayden, Cynthia Kolb Whitney |
| Keywords | Sagnac, Michelson-Gale, Michelson-Morley, special relativity, light speed |
| Published | 1990 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 6 |
| No. of pages | 5 |
| Pages | 71-75 |
Abstract
It is difficult to find critical work about Einstein's Theory of Relativity in most standard physics journals. Galilean Electrodynamics, founded by the late Petr Beckman in 1989, is a notable exception. Since Einstein's 1905 paper, Relativity has had many critics and although it is widely accepted today, there is still a minority who question the central tenets of Relativity Theory. Galilean Electrodynamics is devoted to publishing high quality scientific papers, refereed by professional scientists, that are critical of Special Relativity, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Big Bang theory and other establishment doctrines.
