Difference between revisions of "Ignoring Newton's Hints Brought Scientific Chaos"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Newton did not accept nor espouse action at a distance, but he couldn't provide a physical description of gravity. A great divergence of thought stems from the clash between Newton's Theory indicating that gravity, subject to the inverse square law, is what retains orbits as opposed to Descartes view that whirlpools and eddies sweep planets around the sun. Had Newton's view of space not prevailed, our sequence of acquiring understanding of the universe would have been different. It is what mankind hasn't done since Newton's time that forms our perspective of space today. We haven't defined gravity. | + | Newton did not accept nor espouse action at a distance, but he couldn't provide a physical description of gravity. A great divergence of thought stems from the clash between Newton's Theory indicating that gravity, subject to the inverse square law, is what retains orbits as opposed to Descartes view that whirlpools and eddies sweep planets around the sun. Had Newton's view of space not prevailed, our sequence of acquiring understanding of the universe would have been different. It is what mankind hasn't done since Newton's time that forms our perspective of space today. We haven't defined gravity. |
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|ignoring newton 's hints brought scientific chaos]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Gravity|ignoring newton 's hints brought scientific chaos]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Ignoring Newton\'s Hints Brought Scientific Chaos |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Paul Schroeder |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
| Pages | 525-529 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Newton did not accept nor espouse action at a distance, but he couldn't provide a physical description of gravity. A great divergence of thought stems from the clash between Newton's Theory indicating that gravity, subject to the inverse square law, is what retains orbits as opposed to Descartes view that whirlpools and eddies sweep planets around the sun. Had Newton's view of space not prevailed, our sequence of acquiring understanding of the universe would have been different. It is what mankind hasn't done since Newton's time that forms our perspective of space today. We haven't defined gravity.
