Difference between revisions of "Inertial Modulation: A New Tool for Probing the Law of Electromagnetic Force ? Part II"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Ampere believed longitudinal forces exist between electrical current elements, but relativity theory indicates that this is not possible. Now empirical evidence exists in support of Ampere?s logically-derivable conclusions. In Part II of a three-part article, Peter Graneau?s replication of the classical Robson and Sethian experiment is reported. Robson and Sethian failed to detect longitudinal forces because their apparatus did not incorporate the asymmetry necessary to achieve an unbalanced (net) force.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
Ampere believed longitudinal forces exist between electrical current elements, but relativity theory indicates that this is not possible. Now empirical evidence exists in support of Ampere?s logically-derivable conclusions. In Part II of a three-part article, Peter Graneau?s replication of the classical Robson and Sethian experiment is reported. Robson and Sethian failed to detect longitudinal forces because their apparatus did not incorporate the asymmetry necessary to achieve an unbalanced (net) force.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|inertial modulation new tool probing law electromagnetic force ii]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 10:33, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Inertial Modulation: A New Tool for Probing the Law of Electromagnetic Force ? Part II
Author(s) Thomas E Phipps
Keywords Ampere force, longitudinal force, Lorentz force, Peter Graneau, Robson-Sethian experiment
Published 2006
Journal Electric Spacecraft Journal
Number 40
Pages 6-8

Abstract

Ampere believed longitudinal forces exist between electrical current elements, but relativity theory indicates that this is not possible. Now empirical evidence exists in support of Ampere?s logically-derivable conclusions. In Part II of a three-part article, Peter Graneau?s replication of the classical Robson and Sethian experiment is reported. Robson and Sethian failed to detect longitudinal forces because their apparatus did not incorporate the asymmetry necessary to achieve an unbalanced (net) force.