Difference between revisions of "Inertial Modulation: A New Tool for Probing the Law of Electromagnetic Force ? Part II"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|inertial modulation new tool probing law electromagnetic force ii]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|inertial modulation new tool probing law electromagnetic force ii]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|inertial modulation new tool probing law electromagnetic force ii]] |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Inertial Modulation: A New Tool for Probing the Law of Electromagnetic Force ? Part II |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps |
| Keywords | Ampere force, longitudinal force, Lorentz force, Peter Graneau, Robson-Sethian experiment |
| Published | 2006 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 40 |
| Pages | 6-8 |
Abstract
Ampere believed longitudinal forces exist between electrical current elements, but relativity theory indicates that this is not possible. Now empirical evidence exists in support of Ampere?s logically-derivable conclusions. In Part II of a three-part article, Peter Graneau?s replication of the classical Robson and Sethian experiment is reported. Robson and Sethian failed to detect longitudinal forces because their apparatus did not incorporate the asymmetry necessary to achieve an unbalanced (net) force.
