Difference between revisions of "Interstellar Drives"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|interstellar drives]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] |
Revision as of 10:34, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Interstellar Drives |
Author(s) | David Rosignoli |
Keywords | exotic matter, hyperspace, interstellar travel, teleportation, worm holes |
Published | 2008 |
Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
Number | 44 |
Pages | 8-12 |
Abstract
Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.