Difference between revisions of "Is "Time Dilation" Only Approximately Valid?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Concluding Einstein Centennial, pp. 409-417; article pp. 417-421.</p>[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Concluding Einstein Centennial, pp. 409-417; article pp. 417-421.</p> |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time dilation approximately valid]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:36, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Is \"Time Dilation\" Only Approximately Valid? |
| Author(s) | Paul Wesley |
| Keywords | Time Dilation |
| Published | 1980 |
| Journal | Speculations in Science and Technology |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 409-421 |
Abstract
Concluding Einstein Centennial, pp. 409-417; article pp. 417-421.
