Difference between revisions of "Is the Standard Solution of the Oscillating Electromagnetic Dipole Physically Satisfying?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Standard treatment of the fields of an oscillating dipole entertains contradiction and ignores numerous possible solutions which, if valid, would represent ?other? field properties.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Standard treatment of the fields of an oscillating dipole entertains contradiction and ignores numerous possible solutions which, if valid, would represent ?other? field properties. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|standard solution oscillating electromagnetic dipole physically satisfying]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:36, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Is the Standard Solution of the Oscillating Electromagnetic Dipole Physically Satisfying? |
| Author(s) | Robert P Stirniman |
| Keywords | far fields, gauge theory, Hertzian potential, incomplete solutions, near fields, oscillating dipoles, scalar waves, solutions, standard solution, vector potential |
| Published | 2000 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 31 |
| Pages | 10-19 |
Abstract
Standard treatment of the fields of an oscillating dipole entertains contradiction and ignores numerous possible solutions which, if valid, would represent ?other? field properties.
