Difference between revisions of "Logical Constructions in Special Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Foundations for Special Relativity are often claimed in Michelson`s experiments, which registered constant value of light speed. Lorentz explained this result by variations of length and time caused by movement of the Earth relative to the ether. Einstein gave an alternative explanation: characteristics of space and time in a definite reference system vary, if measured by a moving observer, in such a way that the light speed appears constant. This idea contains several logical discrepancies. The present paper seeks to expose and remedy them.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Foundations for Special Relativity are often claimed in Michelson`s experiments, which registered constant value of light speed. Lorentz explained this result by variations of length and time caused by movement of the Earth relative to the ether. Einstein gave an alternative explanation: characteristics of space and time in a definite reference system vary, if measured by a moving observer, in such a way that the light speed appears constant. This idea contains several logical discrepancies. The present paper seeks to expose and remedy them. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|logical constructions special relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:38, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Logical Constructions in Special Relativity |
Author(s) | Vitaly M Bernstein |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2001 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 12 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 11-16 |
Abstract
Foundations for Special Relativity are often claimed in Michelson`s experiments, which registered constant value of light speed. Lorentz explained this result by variations of length and time caused by movement of the Earth relative to the ether. Einstein gave an alternative explanation: characteristics of space and time in a definite reference system vary, if measured by a moving observer, in such a way that the light speed appears constant. This idea contains several logical discrepancies. The present paper seeks to expose and remedy them.