Difference between revisions of "Logical Insufficiency of the "Two Postulates" of Special Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|logical insufficiency postulates special relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|logical insufficiency postulates special relativity]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|logical insufficiency postulates special relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 19:40, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Logical Insufficiency of the \"Two Postulates\" of Special Relativity |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps |
| Keywords | logical insufficiency, two postulates, special relativity |
| Published | 1993 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 105-106 |
Abstract
It is shown that an alternative kinematics in which the Lorentz contraction does not occur is compatible with the familiar "two postulates" of relativity theory. This implies that possible breaking of spacetime symmetry, inasmuch as such symmetry is not a logical consequence of those postulates.
