Difference between revisions of "Lorentz Contraction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Lorentz contraction is not a change in the physical length of rods or meter sticks. Rather, it is an illusion introduced in special relativity by the lack of remote simultaneity. In Lorentzian relativity, elysium is entrained, so the need for a Lorentz contraction vanishes. | Lorentz contraction is not a change in the physical length of rods or meter sticks. Rather, it is an illusion introduced in special relativity by the lack of remote simultaneity. In Lorentzian relativity, elysium is entrained, so the need for a Lorentz contraction vanishes. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|lorentz contraction]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|lorentz contraction]] |
Latest revision as of 19:41, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Lorentz Contraction |
| Author(s) | Tom Van Flandern |
| Keywords | Lorentz contraction, lack of remote simultaneity |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 7 |
Abstract
Lorentz contraction is not a change in the physical length of rods or meter sticks. Rather, it is an illusion introduced in special relativity by the lack of remote simultaneity. In Lorentzian relativity, elysium is entrained, so the need for a Lorentz contraction vanishes.
