Difference between revisions of "Lorentz Transformations Reconsidered"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A meticulously objective review of the Lorentz transformations assumed as postulates and a review of their prevailing derivations reveal past subtle oversights and kinematics anomalies.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A meticulously objective review of the Lorentz transformations assumed as postulates and a review of their prevailing derivations reveal past subtle oversights and kinematics anomalies. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|lorentz transformations reconsidered]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:38, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Lorentz Transformations Reconsidered |
| Author(s) | Wallace Kantor |
| Keywords | Lorentz transformations, dual kinematics, ignored dual synchroneity, postulates, derivations, logical inconsistencies |
| Published | 1989 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 152-157 |
Abstract
A meticulously objective review of the Lorentz transformations assumed as postulates and a review of their prevailing derivations reveal past subtle oversights and kinematics anomalies.
