Difference between revisions of "M?ssbauer Experiment In A Rotating System On The Second Order Doppler Shift: Confirmation of The Corrected Result By K?ndig"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | We present results of M?ssbauer experiment in a rotating system, whose performance was stimulated by our recent finding (<em>Phys. Scr.</em>, 77 (2008) 035302) and which consisted in the fact that a correct processing of K?ndig's experiment data on the subject gives an appreciable deviation of a relative energy shift (Delta E)/E between emission and absorption resonant lines from the standard prediction based on the relativistic dilation of time (that is (Delta E)/E = -v<sup>2</sup>/(2c<sup>2</sup>) to the accuracy c<sup>-2</sup>, where v is the tangential velocity of absorber of resonant radiation, and c is the light velocity in vacuum). Namely, the K?ndig result we have corrected becomes (Delta E)/E = -kv<sup>2</sup>/(2c<sup>2</sup>), with k=0.596?0.006 (instead of the result k = 0.5003?0.006, originally reported by K?ndig). In our own experiment we carried out measurements for two absorbers with substantially different isomer shift, which allowed us to make a correction of M?ssbauer data regarding vibrations in the rotor system at various rotational frequencies. As a result we got the overall estimation k = 0.68?0.03. | + | We present results of M?ssbauer experiment in a rotating system, whose performance was stimulated by our recent finding (<em>Phys. Scr.</em>, 77 (2008) 035302) and which consisted in the fact that a correct processing of K?ndig's experiment data on the subject gives an appreciable deviation of a relative energy shift (Delta E)/E between emission and absorption resonant lines from the standard prediction based on the relativistic dilation of time (that is (Delta E)/E = -v<sup>2</sup>/(2c<sup>2</sup>) to the accuracy c<sup>-2</sup>, where v is the tangential velocity of absorber of resonant radiation, and c is the light velocity in vacuum). Namely, the K?ndig result we have corrected becomes (Delta E)/E = -kv<sup>2</sup>/(2c<sup>2</sup>), with k=0.596?0.006 (instead of the result k = 0.5003?0.006, originally reported by K?ndig). In our own experiment we carried out measurements for two absorbers with substantially different isomer shift, which allowed us to make a correction of M?ssbauer data regarding vibrations in the rotor system at various rotational frequencies. As a result we got the overall estimation k = 0.68?0.03. |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|m ssbauer experiment rotating second order doppler shift confirmation corrected result k ndig]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|m ssbauer experiment rotating second order doppler shift confirmation corrected result k ndig]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | M?ssbauer Experiment In A Rotating System On The Second Order Doppler Shift: Confirmation of The Corrected Result By K?ndig |
| Author(s) | Alexander L Kholmetskii, Tolga Yarman |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
We present results of M?ssbauer experiment in a rotating system, whose performance was stimulated by our recent finding (Phys. Scr., 77 (2008) 035302) and which consisted in the fact that a correct processing of K?ndig's experiment data on the subject gives an appreciable deviation of a relative energy shift (Delta E)/E between emission and absorption resonant lines from the standard prediction based on the relativistic dilation of time (that is (Delta E)/E = -v2/(2c2) to the accuracy c-2, where v is the tangential velocity of absorber of resonant radiation, and c is the light velocity in vacuum). Namely, the K?ndig result we have corrected becomes (Delta E)/E = -kv2/(2c2), with k=0.596?0.006 (instead of the result k = 0.5003?0.006, originally reported by K?ndig). In our own experiment we carried out measurements for two absorbers with substantially different isomer shift, which allowed us to make a correction of M?ssbauer data regarding vibrations in the rotor system at various rotational frequencies. As a result we got the overall estimation k = 0.68?0.03.
