Difference between revisions of "Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Algebraic Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book  ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page [http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/lorentz.htm Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation] for more.<br />[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book  ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page [http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/lorentz.htm Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation] for more.<br />
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|mathematical inconsistencies einstein s algebraic derivation lorentz transformation]]
  
 
[[Category:Relativity]]
 
[[Category:Relativity]]

Revision as of 10:40, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Algebraic Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation
Author(s) Thomas Smid
Keywords special relativity, Lorentz transformation
Published 2005
Journal None
No. of pages 1 web

Abstract

It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation for more.