Difference between revisions of "Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Algebraic Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page [http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/lorentz.htm Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation] for more.<br /> | + | It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page [http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/lorentz.htm Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation] for more.<br /> |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|mathematical inconsistencies einstein s algebraic derivation lorentz transformation]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|mathematical inconsistencies einstein s algebraic derivation lorentz transformation]] |
Latest revision as of 19:41, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Algebraic Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation |
Author(s) | Thomas Smid |
Keywords | special relativity, Lorentz transformation |
Published | 2005 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 1 web |
Abstract
It is shown that Einstein?s ?simple? algebraic derivation of the Lorentz transformation in his 1920 book ?Relativity: The Special and General Theory? is indeed algebraically inconsistent. Einstein uses two sets of equations that each initially hold only for either a positive or negative value of x,x?, but then he suddenly assumes that both sets hold for positive as well as negative values. Only this sign error enables him to arrive at the Lorentz transformation. See my web page Mathematical Inconsistencies in Einstein?s Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation for more.