Difference between revisions of "Mathematical Methods to Refute Einstein's Electrodynamics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|mathematical methods refute einstein 's electrodynamics]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|mathematical methods refute einstein 's electrodynamics]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Electrodynamics]] | + | [[Category:Electrodynamics|mathematical methods refute einstein 's electrodynamics]] |
Latest revision as of 19:41, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Mathematical Methods to Refute Einstein\'s Electrodynamics |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Velimir Abramovic |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
| Pages | 1-4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This paper explores contradictions in Einstein's definition of simultaneity, and their contribution to the famous Twin Paradox. In the Galilean case, t = t', the Cosmonaut and Earth twins obviously age the same, but in the other cases we obtain ontological contradictions. The problem lies in Einstein's synthesis of non-motion and motion of one and the same light ray. Gauss's Modular or Time Arithmetic helps to identify and sort out the fundamental problems. Despite Einstein, only one time has ever existed: the present. The inequality of entities within the electromagnetic continuum creates the non-synchronicity we call motion.
