Difference between revisions of "Microphysics Needs an Invariant Electrodynamics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Electrodynamics]] | + | [[Category:Electrodynamics|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]] |
Latest revision as of 19:42, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Microphysics Needs an Invariant Electrodynamics |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps, Harold W Milnes |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2002 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 63-70 |
Abstract
A first-order Galilean-invariant covering theory of Maxwell?s equations of vacuum electromagnetism, first proposed by Heinrich Hertz, is reappraised in modern context. Physically, when properly formulated and interpreted for electromagnetic description, Hertz? theory is found to be both necessary, and ? insofar as the empirical facts are presently known ? sufficient. Mathematically, its use of the total time derivative instead of the Maxwellian partial time derivative is shown to be logically necessary under broadly applicable conditions. The physical superiority of the Hertzian formulation in the weak-field limit is emphasized.
