Difference between revisions of "Most Common Misunderstandings About Special Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
# Is it true that electromagnetism is relativistic? That "Classical Physics" is the "limit" of SR for low speeds?<br /> | # Is it true that electromagnetism is relativistic? That "Classical Physics" is the "limit" of SR for low speeds?<br /> | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|common misunderstandings special relativity]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|common misunderstandings special relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Most Common Misunderstandings About Special Relativity |
| Author(s) | Umberto Bartocci |
| Keywords | Special Relativity |
| Published | 1999 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
- Introduction
- What does "special" mean?
- Sagnac effect
- The light?s speed for non-inertial observers
- The Principle of (Special) Relativity and the "twins paradox"
- Roemer observations
- Bradley aberration
- Is it true that electromagnetism is relativistic? That "Classical Physics" is the "limit" of SR for low speeds?
