Difference between revisions of "Motion is Relative to the Universe but Inertia is not"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Based upon the Gravito-Magnetic Theory it is clear that motion can be defined very precisely: the presence and the amplitude of the (gravito)-magnetic component at some place is the very proof of relative motion of an object. Hence, each motion cannot but being relative to the rest of our Universe. On the other hand, inertia can be proven to be not relative to the rest of our Universe, by deduction from the elementary process of force generation, which is found in the Coriolis Gravity Theory, which theory is a fundamental theory of forces and which is entirely compatible with the Gravito-Magnetic Theory. This proves that Mach's Principle (Mach's conjecture) is absurd. | + | Based upon the Gravito-Magnetic Theory it is clear that motion can be defined very precisely: the presence and the amplitude of the (gravito)-magnetic component at some place is the very proof of relative motion of an object. Hence, each motion cannot but being relative to the rest of our Universe. On the other hand, inertia can be proven to be not relative to the rest of our Universe, by deduction from the elementary process of force generation, which is found in the Coriolis Gravity Theory, which theory is a fundamental theory of forces and which is entirely compatible with the Gravito-Magnetic Theory. This proves that Mach's Principle (Mach's conjecture) is absurd. |
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|motion relative universe inertia]] |
| − | [[Category:Structure]] | + | |
| + | [[Category:Gravity|motion relative universe inertia]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Structure|motion relative universe inertia]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:43, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Motion is Relative to the Universe but Inertia is not |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Thierry De Mees |
| Keywords | Coriolis Gravity Theory, inertia, motion |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Based upon the Gravito-Magnetic Theory it is clear that motion can be defined very precisely: the presence and the amplitude of the (gravito)-magnetic component at some place is the very proof of relative motion of an object. Hence, each motion cannot but being relative to the rest of our Universe. On the other hand, inertia can be proven to be not relative to the rest of our Universe, by deduction from the elementary process of force generation, which is found in the Coriolis Gravity Theory, which theory is a fundamental theory of forces and which is entirely compatible with the Gravito-Magnetic Theory. This proves that Mach's Principle (Mach's conjecture) is absurd.
